Court in the Jayalalithaa disproportionate assets case and “restored in full” DA case verdict shows that the corrupt cannot escape from law. The Supreme Court verdict in the disproportionate assets case should The DVAC, thanks to former Chief Minister Jayalalithaa’s hostility, was. SC verdict accuses Jayalalithaa as a mastermind who misused her public Highlighting that the Jayalalithaa disporportionate assets case.

Author: Faesho Vudozilkree
Country: Austria
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Technology
Published (Last): 9 January 2010
Pages: 272
PDF File Size: 2.77 Mb
ePub File Size: 20.1 Mb
ISBN: 929-8-21791-145-3
Downloads: 97827
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Meztizahn

Read full judgment and operative parts here.

Jayallaithaa 15, But once an FIR was registered under the new Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam government on the spate of complaints received against the previous Chief Minister and her associates, the directorate sprung to life. February 14, In fact, a few in the then establishment criticised me for being too law-bound and not sufficiently aggressive.

Failure to pay the fine jayalqlithaa result in an additional year of sentence. SC commences final hearing on the appeals against Jayalalithaa’s acquittal.

What is Jayalalithaa-Sasikala DA Case? This is How It Happened – News18

Following the judgment, Jayalalithaa was moved to Parappana Agrahara prison. The charge of abetment against Sasikala and her family members was also found to be proved, the Court said. Allows Anbazhagan and Karnataka to file written submissions in HC.

The apex court will decide on Karnataka government’s pleas challenging the acquittal of the two leaders in the assets case. Once Jydgement got wind of this, I directed the DVAC investigators to immediately go into Poes Garden for a search because of the apprehension that some elements residing there would destroy valuable evidence.

The caxe of the special court was restored by the apex court. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal.

SC verdict in Jayalalithaa disproportionate assets case is a morale boost – The Hindu

Karnataka government issues a notification withdrawing the appointment of Bhavani Singh as SPP without assigning any reason and without consulting the Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court. Sudhakaran—and sentenced them to four years’ simple imprisonment. Acharya expresses his inability to continue as SPP. Sixthly, the manner in which money moved between various accounts suggested that it was being laundered with full knowledge, says the judgement.


The allegation against Jaya is that she amassed wealth to the tune of Rs 66 crore during her first term in power, between andand Sasikala and the others are accused of helping her.

A special court in Bengaluru had on 27 September convicted Jayalalithaa, N. News States Tamil Nadu. The conviction asssets after. This will alert our moderators to take action.

What will it mean for Sasikala? The gold worth 6-crore was seized as part of a raid on J Jayalalithaa’s Poes Garden house in Chennai in by the income tax department.

Elavarasi for amassing wealth disproportionate to their income when Jayalalithaa was chief minister of Tamil Nadu jayzlalithaa and After 21 days in prison, Jayalalithaa released from prison on bail. The companies, though incorporated before the check period, did not commence any business until the year Anyway, the court said it was “inessential” to delve deep into this aspect considering the “pregnant evidence on record, unassailably proving the disproportionateness of the assets as contemplated in Section 13 1 e of the Prevention of Corruption Act of “.

Disproportionate assets case of Jayalalithaa Jayalalithaa. Then Janata Party president Subramanian Swamy filed a disproportionate assets case against jayalalihaa based on the income tax report in Tell us what you didn’t like in the comments.

Verdict in Jayalalithaa’s DA case in a week? What it means for Sasikala’s bid as CM

Follow Jayalalithaa Follow Disproportionate assets case Follow supreme court to deliver verdict. In his reply, senior advocate Harin Raval for Jayalalithaa questioned Karnataka’s locus standi to file an appeal against the High Court judgment setting aside the attachment of the companies’ assets. All the business they did was buy property. Very few in possession of valuable evidence are willing to stand by their earlier statements while deposing in court.


The Supreme Court said Jayalalithaa did not accommodate Sasikala at Poes Garden out of some “philanthropic urge” but with cold-blooded calculation to keep herself secure from any legal complications, which may arise from their criminal activities.

Jayalalithaa was also sentenced to four years imprisonment and a fine of Rs. A source working closely with the Karnataka prosecution said that if Sasikala is sworn in before the verdict, then Karnataka will tell the court that it was always her ambition to be in public service, and all her actions prior to that should be seen in that light.

Also Read DA case verdict shows that the corrupt cannot escape from law, says Acharya. That should be the stuff of which our prosecutors should be made of. It was a move from which I had been kept away.

Disproportionate assets case against Jayalalithaa

It also instructed the High Court to get written statements from the newly appointed prosecutor of the case by Karnataka government. Retrieved from ” https: The Supreme Court concludes that inthe assets of the accused were valued at Rs. She was also the seventh politician and the first Member of the Legislative Assembly MLA from the state, and the third nationally, [ citation needed ] to be disqualified after the Supreme Court judgement in on the Representation of the People Act that prevents convicted politicians from holding office.

On 27 Septemberthe Special Court convicted all four accused.